V Wolf's latest comment to Dr. Sarah Wollaston - not posted on her site - highlights the candidates hypocrisy of saing one thing in public, and ding another behind the scenes:
"A further comment, prompted by hearing of her recent conversations on BBC Devon about 'trust'. Posted at 11.58 29 April. "It is a great frustration to me that you are painting yourself as a new kind of politician at the same time as refusing to engage in debate about issues which many of your constituents feel very strongly about. You have repeatedly refused to answer our legitimate questions. We are being silenced by 'The Moderator' and you refuse to listen to us, let alone represent us in parliament. You appear to be a person who is bent double under the forces of the Conservative party that are guiding you into this dead end. You describe a wave of hostility toward you, yes, this hostility grows when you abuse your power in this way."
Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts
Thursday, 29 April 2010
Saturday, 24 April 2010
Suppressing debate
In public meetings, Dr. Sarah sells herself on the idea that she is "honest" and "fresh" - a "new" kind of politician. In reality Dr Sarah is suppressing debate by censoring comments on her website and refusing to answer legitimate questions.
In the last few days two comments have been removed from Dr. Wollaston's 'chatmap' including this one:
"Could we see the links to the aforementioned blog please so that we can decide for ourselves whether it is offensive? I ask this because I have observed two very reasonable comments being deleted from this thread today - both of which were requesting clarification on very specific points, and ought to have been fairly straightforward to deal with."
and one from someone supporting me by repeating the questions we want answers to, asking why her inoffensive comments were removed.
Why was the investigation into the party's alignment to Law and Justice launched?
Why was the investigation covered up?
Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason?
Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
This is an issue of substance that Dr. Sarah is failing to address. By censoring comments she has exposed herself to be worse than Anthony Steen ever was.
It's time to stop the spin and answer the questions.
In the last few days two comments have been removed from Dr. Wollaston's 'chatmap' including this one:
"Could we see the links to the aforementioned blog please so that we can decide for ourselves whether it is offensive? I ask this because I have observed two very reasonable comments being deleted from this thread today - both of which were requesting clarification on very specific points, and ought to have been fairly straightforward to deal with."
and one from someone supporting me by repeating the questions we want answers to, asking why her inoffensive comments were removed.
Why was the investigation into the party's alignment to Law and Justice launched?
Why was the investigation covered up?
Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason?
Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
This is an issue of substance that Dr. Sarah is failing to address. By censoring comments she has exposed herself to be worse than Anthony Steen ever was.
It's time to stop the spin and answer the questions.
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
CENSORED!
The Tories have not changed. My follow up comments and the comments from a supporter - both asking questions Dr Wollaston refuses to answer - have been removed from her website.
This is a prime example of Cameron's style over substance. By censoring my comments and closing down free speech, the Tories are now acting like the homophobic Law and Justice party they are aligned with in Europe.
Dr. Wollaston must answer the questions:
Why was the investigation into the party's allignment to Law and Justice launched? Why was the investigation covered up? Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason? Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
Source: http://www.drsarah.org.uk/chatmap [See 'Alleged Homophobia']
She must also think about the implications of her actions. Why set up a debate function on a website if you can't handle difficult questions?
She is simply not fit to serve as MP for Totnes.
This is a prime example of Cameron's style over substance. By censoring my comments and closing down free speech, the Tories are now acting like the homophobic Law and Justice party they are aligned with in Europe.
Dr. Wollaston must answer the questions:
Why was the investigation into the party's allignment to Law and Justice launched? Why was the investigation covered up? Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason? Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
Source: http://www.drsarah.org.uk/chatmap [See 'Alleged Homophobia']
She must also think about the implications of her actions. Why set up a debate function on a website if you can't handle difficult questions?
She is simply not fit to serve as MP for Totnes.
Tuesday, 20 April 2010
"This subject is now closed"?
Today on Dr. Wollaston's discussion forum the following message appeared under my reply to her message:
This subject is now closed. The Moderator has amended the previously offensive caption and has removed details of links to an offensive blog. Otherwise all the entries in this thread remain as original.
- The Moderator
I have replied, although I don't expect them to publish it:
"This subject is now closed"? There are questions Dr. Wollaston has yet to answer. Is she censoring the questions of Totnes voters in the same way the Conservatives covered up the internal investigation into Law and Justice?
If Dr. Wollaston thinks there is "no doubt" that the conservatives have changed, she must answer these questions: Why was the investigation into the party's allignment to Law and Justice launched? Why was the investigation covered up? Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason? Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
Source: http://www.drsarah.org.uk/chatmap [See 'Alleged Homophobia']
This subject is now closed. The Moderator has amended the previously offensive caption and has removed details of links to an offensive blog. Otherwise all the entries in this thread remain as original.
- The Moderator
I have replied, although I don't expect them to publish it:
"This subject is now closed"? There are questions Dr. Wollaston has yet to answer. Is she censoring the questions of Totnes voters in the same way the Conservatives covered up the internal investigation into Law and Justice?
If Dr. Wollaston thinks there is "no doubt" that the conservatives have changed, she must answer these questions: Why was the investigation into the party's allignment to Law and Justice launched? Why was the investigation covered up? Why was Edward McMillian-Scott MEP expelled from the party without notice or reason? Dr. Wollaston also needs to explain what "the slide towards federalism" means.
Source: http://www.drsarah.org.uk/chatmap [See 'Alleged Homophobia']
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)